RatingAdda
RatingAdda
Ratings with the receipts
1

Quad Driver In-Ear Headphones

Insufficient user data for approval % 2 mentions
• Positive 0% (0) • Neutral 100% (2) • Negative 0% (0)

Amazon India leads (the product page when we have it, otherwise an Amazon search), followed by verified trusted-store links (Flipkart, official brand stores, Croma, Reliance Digital, HealthKart, Nutrabay, …). Affiliate links - we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. How this works.

What people loved

No standout praise mined from the discussion - the community talks about this product mostly in neutral or comparative terms.

Common complaints

No common complaints surfaced - either the community generally likes this one, or critique is too scattered to summarise.

Specifications

Specs aren’t in our database for this product yet. We’ll add them as part of the next pipeline run. In the meantime, the Amazon.in listing has the full datasheet.

Reddit discussions

2 of 2
  • u/T6_8K · ▲ 1 · Comment
    neutral
    iems “XENNS Tea Pro - it's stupid how good they are!”
    Oh man... I did the same stupid impulsive sell (got Tea Pro SE and sold the OG) and now I regret it and want to sell the SE and get the OG again :). Can't do the comparison (have the Dusk, don't have the Tea Pro) so take my words with a grain of salt. I'd say it depends on the source gear. If you plan on using Dusk with the DSP cable, you're safe. The treble is a bit smooth and rounded, but it has a shit ton more upper treble than Tea Pro. On higher end (clinical sounding) gear though, the tweeter planars are definitely adding more spice. Tea Pro has audibly more lower treble and it's more "contoured" and exaggerated, but in a very pleasant and incisive way. At the same time, it lacks upper treble shimmer. So treble-wise, it totally depends on where you might or might not be sensitive, what you like, and how your anatomy influences the treble actually sounding to you in IEMs. Dusk is definitely the more natural and neutral sounding (apart from the sick sub-bass boost), but it presents sounds in a very clean, separated way with enough body to not sound clinical. It's fun but very well balanced and technically impressive. It's not the most cohesive set, but that might actually be a good thing. It makes tones very distinct and well separated. Tea Pro is just more fun overall. It's not as technically impressive and doesn't separate tones as well, but it's just more fun. I'm not sure what's going on with the treble exactly. On lower quality sources I had some issues with it, but on more resolving ones it got better and smooth. (Same thing with Tea Pro SE.) No idea what that's about. I think Dusk is overall outstanding, but what I hear as smooth extension you might hear as copious amounts of unnatural treble. No way of knowing without auditioning the set. Seriously, reviews or graphs say shiiiiit about how it will actually work in your ear.
  • u/ConfusionMaximum1192 · ▲ 1 · Comment
    neutral
    iems “XENNS Tea Pro - it's stupid how good they are!”
    Your preferences are same as mine... I had tried most of the IEMs you listed... I was really in love with my Tea Pros... I happen to hear QOA Mojito and I sold the Tea Pro because Mojito was smoother than Tea Pro... Now, I miss the fun factor of Tea Pro and also miss it's wider sound stage... If I had kept Tea Pro a few days more then I would have never sold them... It was an impulsive sell..  I'm now planning to buy Tea Pro again... I also have an urge to try Crinacle dusk... How would you compare Dusk DSP with Tea Pro?  If I had to tackle the slight spicy presentation of Tea Pro on some tracks then is it ideal to choose Dusk?

Discussions analyzed

Other IEMs